HB1002
The General Appropriation Act For The 2025-2026 Fiscal Year.
AI-Generated Summary
This Arkansas House Bill 1002 serves as the General Appropriation Act for the 2025-2026 fiscal year, allocating funds for specific branches of government operations. The bill appropriates funds to the Auditor of State for Judicial Branch expenses, including travel and expenses for District and Trial Judges, totaling $830,000. It also appropriates funds for the Arkansas House of Representatives ($368,000) and the Arkansas Senate ($200,000) specifically for reimbursements of interim expenses incurred by legislators. The act designates the respective officers for disbursing these funds and outlines that disbursements for judicial travel must adhere to specific submission deadlines to the Auditor of State. Furthermore, it includes language making members of the preceding and newly elected General Assemblies eligible for per diem and mileage reimbursement to attend the biennial Institute of Legislative Procedure. The bill includes an emergency clause, asserting immediate necessity for the public peace, health, and safety, setting the effective date as July 1, 2025.
Potential Impact Analysis
Who Might Benefit?
The primary beneficiaries of this bill are the various components of the Arkansas state government structure that rely on these appropriations for their functioning during the 2025-2026 fiscal year. This includes District Judges and Trial Judges, who will receive reimbursement for travel and other necessary expenses. Additionally, the Arkansas House of Representatives and the Arkansas Senate will benefit from funds allocated to reimburse their members for authorized interim expenses. Newly elected and preceding members of the General Assembly are also beneficiaries as they are entitled to per diem and mileage for attending the Institute of Legislative Procedure.
Who Might Suffer?
As this bill is purely an appropriations measure detailing the allocation of state funds to various government functions, there are no groups or entities identified within the text that would be directly and negatively impacted by its enactment. The primary impact of not passing such a bill would be the cessation or severe restriction of funding for the judicial expense reimbursements and legislative interim expense reimbursements after the current fiscal year ends, potentially hindering the normal operations of those governmental bodies.