HB1099
An Act For The State Board Of Election Commissioners Appropriation For The 2025-2026 Fiscal Year.
AI-Generated Summary
This bill appropriates funds for the State Board of Election Commissioners for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. It authorizes the hiring of a maximum of nine (9) regular employees, including a Director, Attorney Specialist, Election Admin Supervisor, Attorney, Business Operations Manager, SBEC Educational Services Manager, Administrative Analyst, and SBEC Election Coordinators. Additionally, it permits the employment of up to twenty (20) temporary or part-time employees, known as "Extra Help." The bill outlines specific appropriations for regular salaries, extra help, personal services matching, maintenance and general operations, and substantial amounts for election expenses and nonpartisan general election costs. It also includes provisions for carrying forward unexpended election expense funds to the subsequent fiscal year, subject to reporting requirements. Furthermore, it allows for the transfer of funds from the Nonpartisan Filing Fee Fund to the Miscellaneous Agencies Fund if the Board requires additional funds to perform its duties. The bill emphasizes compliance with various fiscal control laws and states its legislative intent is to align with budget manual recommendations and committee minutes.
Potential Impact Analysis
Who Might Benefit?
The primary beneficiaries of this bill would be the State Board of Election Commissioners, which would receive the appropriated funds to cover its operational expenses, including salaries, extra help, and election-related costs. The employees of the State Board of Election Commissioners would benefit from the authorized positions and their salaries. The voters of Arkansas would indirectly benefit from the proper functioning and funding of the election administration process. Additionally, temporary and part-time workers could find employment through the "Extra Help" provision.
Who Might Suffer?
This bill does not appear to directly negatively impact any specific groups or entities. Its focus is on appropriating funds to a state agency for its operations and election duties. Potential indirect negative impacts could arise if the appropriations are deemed insufficient by the Board for its intended purposes, leading to operational challenges, or if the conditions for carrying forward funds prove overly burdensome. However, based solely on the provided text, there are no explicit provisions that would directly impose negative consequences on identifiable groups.