HB1086
An Act For The Arkansas Court Of Appeals Appropriation For The 2025-2026 Fiscal Year.
AI-Generated Summary
This bill appropriates funds for the Arkansas Court of Appeals for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. It details the maximum number of regular employees and their salary classifications, including positions like Chief Staff Attorney, Law Clerk, and Judicial Administrative Assistant. The bill also authorizes a limited number of "Extra Help" employees for temporary or part-time roles. It allocates specific amounts for personal services, operating expenses, professional fees, capital outlay, and other legal expenses. The total appropriation for the fiscal year is $6,583,227. The bill mandates compliance with various state fiscal control laws and departmental regulations. It also declares an emergency, stating the act is necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health, and safety, with an effective date of July 1, 2025.
Potential Impact Analysis
Who Might Benefit?
The primary beneficiaries of this bill are the employees of the Arkansas Court of Appeals, including staff attorneys, law clerks, administrative assistants, and clerical staff, who will receive salaries and benefits funded by the appropriation. The court itself will benefit from the allocated funds, enabling it to cover operating expenses, legal counsel, special judges, and mileage reimbursement, thereby facilitating its judicial functions for the 2025-2026 fiscal year. The public also indirectly benefits through the continued operation and efficiency of the appellate court system, which is essential for the administration of justice in Arkansas.
Who Might Suffer?
This bill, being an appropriation measure, does not directly identify specific entities or groups that would be negatively impacted. However, any legislative action that appropriates funds from the state treasury could be seen as having an indirect impact on taxpayers, as these funds are ultimately derived from public revenue. If the appropriations exceed projections or are perceived as inefficiently allocated, it could lead to scrutiny or demand for fiscal responsibility from the general public or oversight bodies. Furthermore, entities that may have sought funding for other state programs or departments could be indirectly impacted if the total state budget limits further allocations.