HB1458
To Amend The Definition Of "credentialing Information" When The Arkansas State Medical Board Is Providing Information To Credentialing Organizations.
AI-Generated Summary
This bill proposes to amend the definition of "credentialing information" as it pertains to the Arkansas State Medical Board providing information to credentialing organizations. Specifically, it seeks to remove the requirement for the board to provide the status of United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) certificates. The amendment would alter Arkansas Code § 17-95-107(b)(2)(A). Currently, this section lists various types of information the board can provide, including professional training, qualifications, background, practice history, clinical hospital privileges, DEA certificate status, education, work history, malpractice coverage and claims history, substance abuse information, board appearances, license status changes, felony convictions, disciplinary activity, and Medicare/Medicaid sanctions. The proposed change focuses solely on the exclusion of DEA certificate status from the information shared. The bill aims to streamline the information-sharing process by removing a specific data point from the mandated disclosure.
Potential Impact Analysis
Who Might Benefit?
The primary beneficiaries of this bill would be physicians licensed to practice in Arkansas and credentialing organizations that process applications for physicians. By removing the requirement for the Arkansas State Medical Board to provide the status of United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) certificates, physicians may experience a simplified or expedited credentialing process. Credentialing organizations would also benefit from a potentially less complex data request, as they would no longer need to obtain or process this specific piece of information from the medical board. This could lead to more efficient administrative workflows for both physicians and the entities that credential them.
Who Might Suffer?
If this bill becomes law, potential negative impacts could be felt by credentialing organizations and potentially regulatory bodies or healthcare facilities that rely on comprehensive information for physician credentialing. By removing the requirement to share DEA certificate status, credentialing organizations may have a less complete picture of a physician's regulatory standing. This could potentially increase the burden on credentialing organizations to independently verify DEA certificate status, if they deem it necessary for their vetting processes. While not directly named, any entity or patient population that benefits from the oversight provided by the inclusion of DEA certificate status in the credentialing process might also be indirectly impacted if this information is deemed critical for ensuring provider qualifications and compliance.